Futuregames client case · Experience Design · 2026
A clearer way to find the right wallpaper.
I helped turn findings from accessibility reviews and usability tests into concrete changes to Duro Sweden’s catalogue and product flow.
- Role
- UX/UI designer in a team of four
- Time
- 9–26 February 2026
- Scope
- Focused desktop shopping flow
- Output
- Tested Figma concept + coded demo
The brief
Accessibility in one shopping journey.
Duro asked us to improve accessibility. After the client debrief, we focused on one desktop flow: find a wallpaper, choose a variant, and save it without losing your place. We reviewed the proposal against WCAG 2.1 AA.
This is a tested proposal and independent demo. It was not deployed on Duro Sweden’s production website.
Why the design changed
Three points of friction.
In the baseline tests, people lost their place, struggled to narrow the catalogue, and got little confirmation after an action. Those findings set the three priorities below.
- 01Compare
Sandberg Wallpaper analysis
- 02Audit
Manual + Squidler WCAG review
- 03Observe
4 baseline usability sessions
- 04Synthesize
Affinity map + How might we questions
Explore a design decision
Catalogue filters
Make filtering predictable.
- Observed
- Only one option could be selected per filter category. Some colour-filter results did not match what participants expected, and the page updated before they had finished choosing.
- Designed
- Use checkbox multi-select, visible filter state, and explicit Apply and Clear actions. Show colour variants in the product grid so the result can be judged before opening a product.
- Evidence
- Participants could use the prototype’s multi-select filters to combine options.
Prototype test
52% less time on the timed task.
Four participants tested the Figma prototype. The final pitch reported the times below for a timed find-a-product task.
A result from a small student test, not evidence of conversion lift or full WCAG conformance.
My role
My focus: filtering.
I worked on it from the first test notes through Figma and into the coded prototype.
What I did
- Compared Sandberg Wallpaper and contributed to the manual and tool-assisted WCAG review.
- Helped plan the test tasks, moderated one session in each round, and used the findings to sketch the filtering flow.
- Built the filtering UI in Figma with reusable component states, updated the walkthrough, and presented in the final pitch.
Together, we delivered the Figma concept, group report, recorded walkthrough, and final pitch.
Coded prototype
The filter logic in code.
Alongside the Figma work, I extended an AI-assisted React scaffold. My commits focused on multi-select filters, selected-filter chips, product data and detail fixes, and deployment. The broader demo also includes wishlist, cart, and toast flows.
- Figma
- WCAG 2.1
- Usability testing
- React
- TypeScript
What I took forward
Lead with the solution.
The final pitch taught me to show the solution and its business value first, then use the research to explain each decision.